Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation

gemini-2.5-pro vs claude-opus-4-6

+8-point lift for gemini-2.5-pro on financial-doc-extract

Test summary

This benchmark evaluates gemini-2.5-pro against claude-opus-4-6 on the financial-doc-extract v2 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5). gemini-2.5-pro reached a 65% pass rate versus 57% for claude-opus-4-6 — a +8-point lift.

Base model
claude-opus-4-6
via anthropic · 57% pass rate
Refined model
gemini-2.5-pro
via google · 65% pass rate · 0.5s p95
Base pass rate
57%
Refined pass rate
65%
Refined p95
0.5s
Est. tokens saved
1.2K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model
0%
Invoked-refined
2 improved0 regressed3 unchanged

Per-row results

1Identify a going-concern note in the footnotes100%100%0
2Determine the reporting period from a 10-Q header100%100%0
3Extract total debt from a balance sheet0%100%+100
4Extract net revenue and YoY change from an earnings PDF100%100%0
5Pull the diluted EPS from an income statement0%100%+100
Prove the lift on your own data.

Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.

Try Invoked
Generated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks