Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
claude-opus-4-6 vs claude-opus-4-8
-1-point lift for claude-opus-4-6 on financial-doc-extract
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates claude-opus-4-6 against claude-opus-4-8 on the financial-doc-extract v3 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5). claude-opus-4-6 reached a 42% pass rate versus 43% for claude-opus-4-8 — a -1-point lift.
- Base model
- claude-opus-4-8
- via anthropic · 43% pass rate
- Refined model
- claude-opus-4-6
- via anthropic · 42% pass rate · 3.1s p95
Base pass rate
43%
Refined pass rate
42%
Refined p95
3.1s
Est. tokens saved
539
−0pts
no lift — the base model held its ground
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲0 improved▼1 regressed●4 unchanged
Per-row results
1Identify a going-concern note in the footnotes100% → 100%0
2Extract net revenue and YoY change from an earnings PDF0% → 0%0
3Extract total debt from a balance sheet100% → 0%-100
4Pull the diluted EPS from an income statement100% → 100%0
5Determine the reporting period from a 10-Q header100% → 100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks