Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation

claude-opus-4-6 vs claude-opus-4-8

+9-point lift for claude-opus-4-6 on financial-doc-extract

Test summary

This benchmark evaluates claude-opus-4-6 against claude-opus-4-8 on the financial-doc-extract v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5). claude-opus-4-6 reached a 43% pass rate versus 34% for claude-opus-4-8 — a +9-point lift.

Base model
claude-opus-4-8
via anthropic · 34% pass rate
Refined model
claude-opus-4-6
via anthropic · 43% pass rate · 2.6s p95
Base pass rate
34%
Refined pass rate
43%
Refined p95
2.6s
Est. tokens saved
8.7K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model
0%
Invoked-refined
▲3 improved▼1 regressed●1 unchanged

Per-row results

1Extract total debt from a balance sheet0% → 100%+100
2Determine the reporting period from a 10-Q header0% → 100%+100
3Pull the diluted EPS from an income statement100% → 100%0
4Extract net revenue and YoY change from an earnings PDF0% → 100%+100
5Identify a going-concern note in the footnotes100% → 0%-100
Prove the lift on your own data.

Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.

Try Invoked
Generated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks