Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
gemini-1.5-pro vs claude-sonnet-4-6
+10-point lift for gemini-1.5-pro on contract-clause-qa
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates gemini-1.5-pro against claude-sonnet-4-6 on the contract-clause-qa v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (llama-3.1-8b). gemini-1.5-pro reached a 44% pass rate versus 34% for claude-sonnet-4-6 — a +10-point lift.
- Base model
- claude-sonnet-4-6
- via anthropic · 34% pass rate
- Refined model
- gemini-1.5-pro
- via google · 44% pass rate · 1.1s p95
Base pass rate
34%
Refined pass rate
44%
Refined p95
1.1s
Est. tokens saved
2.6K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲0 improved▼0 regressed●5 unchanged
Per-row results
1Locate the termination-for-convenience terms0% → 0%0
2Find the liability cap and its exceptions100% → 100%0
3Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0% → 0%0
4Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs100% → 100%0
5Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction100% → 100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks