Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation

gemini-1.5-pro vs claude-sonnet-4-6

+10-point lift for gemini-1.5-pro on contract-clause-qa

Test summary

This benchmark evaluates gemini-1.5-pro against claude-sonnet-4-6 on the contract-clause-qa v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (llama-3.1-8b). gemini-1.5-pro reached a 44% pass rate versus 34% for claude-sonnet-4-6 — a +10-point lift.

Base model
claude-sonnet-4-6
via anthropic · 34% pass rate
Refined model
gemini-1.5-pro
via google · 44% pass rate · 1.1s p95
Base pass rate
34%
Refined pass rate
44%
Refined p95
1.1s
Est. tokens saved
2.6K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model
0%
Invoked-refined
0 improved0 regressed5 unchanged

Per-row results

1Locate the termination-for-convenience terms0%0%0
2Find the liability cap and its exceptions100%100%0
3Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0%0%0
4Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs100%100%0
5Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction100%100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.

Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.

Try Invoked
Generated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks