Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation

mistral-large vs claude-sonnet-4-6

+11-point lift for mistral-large on contract-clause-qa

Test summary

This benchmark evaluates mistral-large against claude-sonnet-4-6 on the contract-clause-qa v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (gpt-4o-mini). mistral-large reached a 51% pass rate versus 40% for claude-sonnet-4-6 — a +11-point lift.

Base model
claude-sonnet-4-6
via anthropic · 40% pass rate
Refined model
mistral-large
via mistral · 51% pass rate · 2.9s p95
Base pass rate
40%
Refined pass rate
51%
Refined p95
2.9s
Est. tokens saved
4.1K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model
0%
Invoked-refined
▲2 improved▼1 regressed●2 unchanged

Per-row results

1Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction0% → 100%+100
2Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0% → 100%+100
3Find the liability cap and its exceptions0% → 0%0
4Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs100% → 0%-100
5Locate the termination-for-convenience terms100% → 100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.

Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.

Try Invoked
Generated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks