Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
claude-opus-4-6 vs claude-sonnet-5
+11-point lift for claude-opus-4-6 on contract-clause-qa
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates claude-opus-4-6 against claude-sonnet-5 on the contract-clause-qa v3 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5). claude-opus-4-6 reached a 39% pass rate versus 28% for claude-sonnet-5 — a +11-point lift.
- Base model
- claude-sonnet-5
- via anthropic · 28% pass rate
- Refined model
- claude-opus-4-6
- via anthropic · 39% pass rate · 1.6s p95
Base pass rate
28%
Refined pass rate
39%
Refined p95
1.6s
Est. tokens saved
1.8K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲1 improved▼0 regressed●4 unchanged
Per-row results
1Find the liability cap and its exceptions0% → 100%+100
2Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0% → 0%0
3Locate the termination-for-convenience terms100% → 100%0
4Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs0% → 0%0
5Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction100% → 100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks