Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
claude-opus-4-8 vs gpt-4.1-mini
+22-point lift for claude-opus-4-8 on financial-doc-extract
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates claude-opus-4-8 against gpt-4.1-mini on the financial-doc-extract v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5, run locally). claude-opus-4-8 reached a 58% pass rate versus 36% for gpt-4.1-mini — a +22-point lift.
- Base model
- gpt-4.1-mini
- via openai · 36% pass rate
- Refined model
- claude-opus-4-8
- via anthropic · 58% pass rate · 1.6s p95
Base pass rate
36%
Refined pass rate
58%
Refined p95
1.6s
Est. tokens saved
13.6K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲2 improved▼0 regressed●3 unchanged
Per-row results
1Extract net revenue and YoY change from an earnings PDF100% → 100%0
2Determine the reporting period from a 10-Q header0% → 100%+100
3Pull the diluted EPS from an income statement100% → 100%0
4Identify a going-concern note in the footnotes0% → 100%+100
5Extract total debt from a balance sheet100% → 100%0
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks