Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
mistral-large vs gpt-4-turbo
+22-point lift for mistral-large on contract-clause-qa
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates mistral-large against gpt-4-turbo on the contract-clause-qa v2 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (llama-3.1-8b). mistral-large reached a 54% pass rate versus 32% for gpt-4-turbo — a +22-point lift.
- Base model
- gpt-4-turbo
- via openai · 32% pass rate
- Refined model
- mistral-large
- via mistral · 54% pass rate · 2.5s p95
Base pass rate
32%
Refined pass rate
54%
Refined p95
2.5s
Est. tokens saved
3.8K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲1 improved▼0 regressed●4 unchanged
Per-row results
1Locate the termination-for-convenience terms100% → 100%0
2Find the liability cap and its exceptions0% → 0%0
3Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs100% → 100%0
4Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0% → 0%0
5Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction0% → 100%+100
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks