Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation

mistral-large vs llama-3.1-70b

+7-point lift for mistral-large on medical-coding-extract

Test summary

This benchmark evaluates mistral-large against llama-3.1-70b on the medical-coding-extract v1 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (llama-3.1-8b). mistral-large reached a 47% pass rate versus 40% for llama-3.1-70b — a +7-point lift.

Base model
llama-3.1-70b
via ollama · 40% pass rate
Refined model
mistral-large
via mistral · 47% pass rate · 1.8s p95
Base pass rate
40%
Refined pass rate
47%
Refined p95
1.8s
Est. tokens saved
9.9K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model
0%
Invoked-refined
2 improved1 regressed2 unchanged

Per-row results

1Identify a contraindication from a problem list100%0%-100
2Determine the correct E/M level from a visit note100%100%0
3Extract medication + dosage from a clinical note0%0%0
4Pull the procedure code from an operative report0%100%+100
5Map a discharge summary to the primary ICD-10 code0%100%+100
Prove the lift on your own data.

Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.

Try Invoked
Generated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks