Prove the lift · AI model performance evaluation
gpt-5.1 vs mistral-large
+25-point lift for gpt-5.1 on contract-clause-qa
Test summary
This benchmark evaluates gpt-5.1 against mistral-large on the contract-clause-qa v3 dataset (5 rows), scored by an LLM-as-judge (claude-haiku-4-5). gpt-5.1 reached a 49% pass rate versus 24% for mistral-large — a +25-point lift.
- Base model
- mistral-large
- via mistral · 24% pass rate
- Refined model
- gpt-5.1
- via openai · 49% pass rate · 1.7s p95
Base pass rate
24%
Refined pass rate
49%
Refined p95
1.7s
Est. tokens saved
3.1K
+0pts
refined beats base on 5 rows
0%
Base model0%
Invoked-refined▲2 improved▼0 regressed●3 unchanged
Per-row results
1Find the liability cap and its exceptions100% → 100%0
2Locate the termination-for-convenience terms0% → 100%+100
3Determine indemnification scope and carve-outs0% → 0%0
4Extract the auto-renewal notice window in days0% → 100%+100
5Identify the governing-law clause and jurisdiction0% → 0%0
Prove the lift on your own data.
Run any two models over your tasks, judged automatically, and see the improvement — in seconds.
Try InvokedGenerated with Invoked · Browse all benchmarks